Early Legal History of Israel (1441-961 BCE): 3D Decalogue

Dr. Metzler-Moziani (Photo), The Metzler Formula

–– Photograph taken in April 2000 ––
    http://back.to/moses

As   a   legal scientist, he discovered the
3D structure of the Ten Commandments
in 1983, and succeeded in reconstructing
the famous two stone Tablets of the Law
of the Torah of Moses from the Sinai,
complete and precise to the millimeter.

Mosaical Metrology · 3D Decalogue · 2D Alphabet · Kabbalah · Pyramids · Israelite Dynasty · Philosophy · Musical Theory · Metzler Formula · Mosaical Religions

This Jewish History Ring site
is owned by Dr. Ewald (Ed) Metzler, M.C.L..

[Join Now] [Previous] [Next] [Next 5 Sites]
[Ring Hub] [Random Site] [List Sites]

This website is designed to be viewed at screen resolutions of 640 x 480 or 800 x 600 pixels.

Ten Commandments 89

in    alphabetical script, which was conceived by
the people of Israel.⁵³⁾ The reason for placing
the    letters    Alef    and    Bet    at the top of the
alphabetical order, and thus the very name of
the    alphabet    results    from the Ten Command-
ments, for their first line begins on face A of
the first stone tablet with the letter Alef, and
their second line on face B with the letter Bet.
The    Bible    constitutes    the    oldest collection of
alphabetical literature that grew around the law
of    the    two    tablets    of the Torah of Moses,
and    the    alphabet    contains    the    key    to their
three-dimensional structure.⁵⁴⁾

末末末末末末末末

                    53) Not every phonetic script is an alphabet in the strict
sense    characterized    by its unique alphabetical order: Neither the
so-called    Egyptian    "alphabet"    of    one-consonant hieroglyphs nor
the    so-called Ethiopian "alphabet", in spite of its Sinaitic origin,
are true alphabets, because Alef and Bet were never placed at the
top of their sequence of letters, and not sharing the Torah of Moses with Israel, there was no reason to do so.
                    54) See TORAH OF THE ALPHABET (N. 1) p. 18. The
original meaning of the Tablets of the Law has to be distinguished
from    their    later    interpretation    (above    Note    46). Such a double
interpretation (duplex interpretatio) is also known in Roman Law,
where the Corpus Juris of the Emperor Justinian may differ widely
from the classical original, cf. Fritz Schulz (N. 20) p. 4. Similarly,
what the Constitution of the United States of America means today
is not always what the founding fathers meant.

– 29 –